For the last 20 years, the classic SME structure in Australia relied on discretionary trusts, family distributions, and surplus profits pushed into a bucket company with tax capped at 25% or 30%. The Budget does not specifically abolish this strategy. But it may fundamentally change whether it still works.
It has been one of the most commonly used structures in Australian business.
And for many SMEs, the biggest issue is not the discretionary trust itself. It is the potential destruction of the economics behind bucket companies.
Bucket companies solved several major problems for business owners. They allowed:
In simple terms, they became a pressure valve for excess trust income. Historically, that strategy worked extremely well.
Under the proposed rules from 1 July 2028:
That final point is the major issue. Because under the proposal the trust will pay tax first, and the company will then pay tax again.
| Step | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Trust distributes $100k to bucket company | Company taxed at 25% |
| Tax paid | $25,000 |
| Remaining retained profits | $75,000 |
Simple. Efficient. Predictable.
Assume: trust earns $100,000, distributes to company beneficiary.
| Step | Amount |
|---|---|
| Trust minimum tax @30% | $30,000 |
| Company includes income | $100,000 |
| Company tax @25% | $25,000 |
| Credit available to company | Nil |
| Combined tax before dividends | $55,000 |
And that is BEFORE dividends are paid, shareholders pay top-up tax, or Division 7A extraction occurs.
Thousands of SME groups currently rely on discretionary trusts, bucket companies, retained earnings strategies, and inter-entity lending.
Many structures have:
Business owners using bucket companies and related trust structures should also be aware of the ATO’s ongoing focus on private company benefits (including Division 7A), particularly where profits are extracted or retained in ways that may produce unintended tax consequences.
If the economics of bucket companies materially deteriorate, those structures will need complete review.
Not necessarily. But their purpose may fundamentally change.
Historically, bucket companies were often used primarily for tax deferral and tax minimisation.
Going forward, structures may need to focus more heavily on:
The trust itself may still remain extremely valuable. But the way profits flow through the structure may need to change materially.
This is where many business owners may overreact. The answer is NOT everyone should move into companies immediately.
Because changing structures creates other major issues including:
Some businesses may ultimately decide the operating business should sit in a company, while trusts continue to hold ownership interests or passive assets. Others may keep the trust but fundamentally alter distribution strategy.
The correct answer depends entirely on profitability, family circumstances, future exit plans, retained earnings requirements, and succession objectives.
The biggest risk for SME groups is not necessarily the new tax itself. The biggest risk is being trapped inside a structure that was built for yesterday’s tax rules.
Many structures currently in place were designed around lower corporate tax arbitrage, trust income splitting, bucket company retention strategies, and long-term tax deferral. If those advantages materially reduce, the structure itself may no longer align with the commercial objectives of the business.
Every SME group using discretionary trusts and bucket companies should now review:
The proposed reforms do NOT mean: “Trusts are dead.”
But they may mean: “The traditional trust and bucket company strategy no longer achieves what it was originally designed to do.”
That is a very different conversation.
For many SMEs, the next 12 to 18 months may become the most important structure review period they have ever undertaken.
Take the next step
Book a free clarity call with our team. We will look at your structure, walk through your specific risks, and give you a clear picture of what needs reviewing before 30 June 2027.